Trilogy of Trilogies: The Star Wars Prequels (for Alternate Ending)

I’m writing a three-part series for ‘Alternate Ending‘ exploring blockbuster movies of the 2000s. It’s a trilogy about trilogies! This is the last entry in the series, which previously covered The Lord of the Rings and The Matrix.

It’s hard to think of a movie (or series of movies) that has been analyzed, criticized, and reconsidered more widely and thoroughly in recent years than the Star Wars prequels (with the exception, perhaps, of The Last Jedi.) The degree to which the internet has dedicated itself to discuss George Lucas’s prequel trilogy since The Phantom Menace came out in 1999 is, frankly, ridiculous; but it’s also catnip for a series about the great movie trilogies of the 2000s. So far, we’ve looked at The Lord of the Rings and The Matrix movies, and in both cases I’ve approached them both as important historical artifacts and as examples of great, idiosyncratic blockbuster filmmaking. All of this gets a little trickier when talking about the prequels. As far as the filmmaking is concerned, I can hardly make a coherent case – not because there’s no art to be found in them (they are, at the very least, very “idiosyncratic” movies), but because the conversation about the artistic quality of the movies has reached a point in which everything has been said from every angle and ad nauseam. The historical case is easier to make. The prequels mark an incredibly influential step in the development of both computer generated effects and the use of digital cameras, both of which are cornerstones of Hollywood filmmaking in the 2020s. Even more remarkable, though, is the historical importance of the way in which the movies were received by movie-goers, fans, and the culture at large. The response to these movies may very well be the most important shift in film culture form the 20th to the 21st Century. The story of how George Lucas went from being perceived as a creative genius to an out-of-touch eccentric, a story that ended with Lucas willingly selling his creation to one of the biggest media conglomerates, encapsulates the trajectory of American blockbuster filmmaking almost too perfectly.

A recapitulation of events is probably unnecessary, but for formality’s sake, let me do a brief synopsis of the history of one George Walton Lucas Jr. As an up-and-coming filmmaker in the early seventies, Lucas tried to leverage the goodwill he had amassed for directing the very successful American Graffiti to finance a science fiction movie that was meant to be an homage to the space opera serials of his youth. The result was a little movie called Star Warswhich not only became a huge hit, but the highest grossing movie of all time. Though the movie was distributed by 20th Century Fox, Lucas retained the rights to the film, which allowed him to become extremely rich by making two sequels (and thus cementing the idea of the “trilogy” as an ideal form for epic cinematic storytelling), and more importantly, by selling lots and lots of merchandise. By the mid-nineties, the centrality of Star Wars in the cultural discourse had subsided, but a visionary Lucas, encouraged by the development of computer generated visual effects, decided to write and direct a “prequel” trilogy, depicting the backstory that leads into his original trilogy. These movies were huge commercial successes, but critical disappointments… to say the least.

CONTINUE READING AT ‘ALTERNATE ENDING’

Trilogy of Trilogies: The Matrix (for Alternate Ending)

I’m writing a three-part series for ‘Alternate Ending‘ exploring blockbuster movies of the 2000s. It’s a trilogy about trilogies! A new entry comes out the first Thursday of the month from now until June.

“To be concluded.” These are the words that close out The Matrix Reloaded, and for this series – in which I argue for the 2000s as the peak of blockbuster cinema – they are invaluable. That the Wachowki sisters chose “concluded” instead of the more traditional “continued” is proof they saw trilogies as a distinct form of storytelling: one that allowed for larger ambition than a single movie, but was still designed to tell a finite story. A form of storytelling that was designed to end. This common denominator among the trilogies of this time period is also one of their greatest strengths. Compared to the franchise blockbusters of the 2010s, which are designed to continue on endlessly, these self-contained trilogies feel like the height of idiosyncratic, auteurist filmmaking. With that in mind, the case of the Matrix movies is particularly interesting as it stands alone among its peers for not being based on pre-existing material. In theory, this should have given the Wachowkis the freedom to steer their ship according to their own interests and expectations. In reality, the Matrix sequels were not only received with deep disappointment, but their infamous reception played a key role in ushering away the golden age of blockbuster trilogies.

When The Matrix hit hard and became an instant phenomenon in early 1999. The story of a computer hacker who leads a rebellion after discovering he’s been living in a simulation run by oppressive machines couldn’t have come out at a better point in time. Coming amidst the first internet boom, and on the eve of Y2K, the only thing that was more exciting than The Matrix‘s prescience was its incredible action sequences. Borrowing heavily from hong kong action cinema of the previous decades, it was a mix of martial arts brawls, maximalist shoot-outs, and “bullet time” set pieces that turned The Matrix into one of the most influential action movies in Hollywood history. Sequels were a no-brainer, but when The Matrix Reloaded arrived in Spring 2003, it was met with dubious disappointment. David Edelstein of Salon said the movie was “as messy and flat-footed as its predecessor is nimble and shapely.” Nathan Rabin of the A. V. Club lamented the Wachowskis were “so enthralled by the convoluted mythology of their own private universe that they’ve lost touch with its human core.”* Some reviewers held up hope for the third installment, but by the time The Matrix Revolutions concluded the trilogy that Fall, all hope had been lost. If Reloaded was too convoluted, Revolutions was an outright failure. Writing for the Los Angeles Times, Manohla Dargis wondered: “How did something that started out so cool get so dorky?”

CONTINUE READING AT ‘ALTERNATE ENDING’

Trilogy of Trilogies: The Lord of the Rings (for Alternate Ending)

I’m writing a three-part series for ‘Alternate Ending‘ exploring blockbuster movies of the 2000s. It’s a trilogy about trilogies! A new entry comes out the first Thursday of the month from now until June.

Allow me to make the case for the first decade of the twenty-first century as the peak of American blockbuster cinema. I know what you’re thinking: this dude’s tripping on his own nostalgia. But consider the fact that, while there great blockbusters were made before and after, the turn of the millennium provided the perfect circumstances for big studio spectacles to flourish both commercially, and more importantly, creatively. Movies have only gotten bigger, more expensive, and fuller of visual effects since, but except for a couple of movies here and there, the personal touch of the director has pretty much disappeared from blockbuster cinema.

In this Trilogy of Trilogies series, I want to explore not only the way that these movies excelled at being the best blockbuster cinema has to offer, but how their success ended up paving the way for their own demise. This first entry focuses on the Lord of the Rings trilogy as re-imagined for the screen by Peter Jackson. The second will focus on The Matrix movies, and the third on the infamous Star Wars prequels. Looking back on these trilogies, it becomes clear exactly how a short era of artistically driven, commercially successful blockbusters led to the current landscape of corporatized franchise entertainment.

If you are still on the fence about my claim, I have identified three criteria that make the movies of this period stand out from what came before and after…

CONTINUE READING AT ALTERNATE ENDING

A Beginner’s Guide to Looney Tunes (for Alternate Ending)

rabbit of seville
Welcome to my shop, let me cut your mop, let me shave your crop, daint-til-y!

The following article has been published at Alternate Ending

Where to start with the Looney Tunes? Ask an animation buff, and they will talk your ear off detailing the ways in which these are the most groundbreaking, influential and hilarious cartoons of the classic Hollywood era. And why stop there? One could easily argue for Duck Amuck and What’s Opera, Doc? as two of the best movies ever made. So much of American comedy has been deeply influenced by the Looney Tunes, partly because three generations (boomers, genxers, and millennials) grew up watching Bug Bunny and Road Runner cartoons on television. Things are different these days. Kids don’t just turn on the t.v. and watch whatever is on, they have Youtube, Netflix, and many other ways to watch exactly what they want whenever they want. But all is not lost. An extensive selection of classic Looney Tunes shorts as well as a new series called Looney Tunes Cartoons are currently available to stream via HBOMax. It’s a good time to be a Looney Tunes fan, and a great time to become one if you aren’t already. I know the sheer amount of material available right now can be a little overwhelming – where do you start? – but that’s where this article comes in. Call this an introduction, a crash course, a viewing guide – it doesn’t matter. What’s important is you’re about to enter the wonderful world of Looney Tunes.

CONTINUE READING AT ALTERNATE ENDING.

2003: The Greatest Movie Summer of Them All (for Alternate Ending)

pirates

The following article has been published at Alternate Ending

With movie theaters closed and all major studio movies delayed indefinitely, the 2020 summer movie season is a no go. Those who wish to recreate the experience of going to see the latest blockbuster are stuck looking back at the summer seasons of the past. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. If you’re like me, you spend most summer seasons complaining about the decline of the American blockbuster. How beautiful is it, then, to be able to pick and choose from your past favorites. For me, looking back at past summer favorites has resulted in a newfound appreciation for the class of 2003, an unlikely contender that is creeping up on me as a damn solid summer. Let’s take with a grain of salt the fact that I was eleven years old back in ’03 (the perfect age to fall in love with flashy Hollywood spectacle) and let me submit for your consideration: the great summer of 2003…

CONTINUE READING AT ALTERNATE ENDING.

Disney Has a Villain Problem (for Alternate Ending)

zootopia-sheep

This month over at Alternate Ending, I tackle something that’s been bothering me for a while: Disney’s inability to produce any memorable villains in the past ten or so years, which led me to talking about bigger frustrations I have with the way things are going over at Disney/Pixar. Excerpt below, or you can go ahead and read the whole thing Here.


What’s your favorite Disney villain? When answering this question, most people will be able to rattle off a number of possibilities within seconds. MaleficentJafarCaptain HookScarUrsulaCruella De Vil. There are so many options you’ll have a hard time narrowing your list to just one. The responses are totally different, however, when we tweak the question just a bit: What’s you favorite Disney villain of the past ten years? Suddenly the pool dries up and you’re left with Tangled‘s Mother Gothel (a superb villain in her own right) as the only reasonable option. These days, most Disney movies are saddled with utterly forgettable adversaries, and that’s if they feature a villain at all. Can you even remember the name of the main villain in Zootopia, Big Hero 6, or The Princess and the Frog? Villains have disappeared from Disney movies, and that’s a problem. Not because villains are essential to good cinema (although who doesn’t love a great villain?), but because the studio’s new approach to villainous characters points toward bigger problems in the way they make movies.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL ARTICLE

Report from the New York Film Festival (for Alternate Ending)

la-1536109165-9clcpi66rn-snap-image

As part of my work over at Alternate Ending, I’ve written some short reviews to some of the movies I saw at this year’s New York Film Festival. So if you’re interested in that kind of thing, hop over there and you’ll find reviews of…

The Favourite, directed by Yorgos Lanthimos (The Lobster) and starring Emma Stone, Rachel Weisz and Olivia Colman.

ROMA, the latest movie by Alfonso Cuarón (Oscar-winning director of Gravity).

If Beale Street Could TalkBarry Jenkins’s follow-up to his beloved Moonlight.

The Ballad of Buster Scruggswhich started as a Netflix series but became a movie in which the Coen Brothers explore the western.

Below is an excerpt from my review of ROMA, which was my favorite of the four, and one of the best movies I’ve seen so far this year.


The festival’s prestigious centerpiece spot was given to Roma, which sees director Alfonso Cuarón follow up his Oscar-winning work in Gravity with a much more personal story. To say that the movie is based on Cuarón’s upbringing in 1970s Mexico City would be technically correct, but a little misleading. Unlike most directors who make movies based on their childhood, Cuarón doesn’t center the story around a little boy who stand-ins for him, but chooses instead to focus on one of the maids who worked for his middle-class family. We first see Cleo, played beautifully by Yalitza Aparicio, washing a tile floor and performing other domestic duties as family life occurs around her. The children of the house adore her, partially because her job is to take care of them, while the mother -who is going through an emotional struggle of her own- oscillates between sympathetic and cruel. At first Cleo seems to be an entry point for the movie to dig deeper into the family, but it becomes apparent rather quickly that this is her story, and that that’s the point of the movie.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL REVIEW